Philippine Senate Erupts in Drama Over Alleged Attack

The Philippine Senate recently erupted in drama when one senator cried foul after being publicly corrected by another senator. The senator threatened to file an ethics complaint, but internet users were quick to remind them of past statements that contradicted their current claims. They didn't hesitate to point out the inconsistencies.

The senator had once called the youth 'weak' because they couldn't stomach criticism, which made their current reaction seem hypocritical. Another senator wailed about why no one had cared enough to ask how she was doing after she endured the so-called direct attack on the Senate. However, social media users pointed out that there were photos of some of the senators smiling and enjoying dinner on the night of the alleged attack. Some of them had even posted live videos on social media. It's clear that they didn't seem too affected by the incident.

A senator showed a screenshot of the Senate group chat, where the senators who had left had actually checked on the senators left behind inside the Senate when the attacks supposedly took place. Later, an assessment of the CCTV footage showed no evidence of any such attack. The people who were actually caught in the crossfire were the media, who continued to report and archive without meltdowns or whining. They didn't let the drama affect their work.

The internet dug deeper into its archives, with people asking if the sobbing senator had ever thought of asking how people were doing after major floods, considering that she hadn't signed the flood control corruption report. Had she ever asked about the everyday lives of Filipinos who had to deal with traffic, inflation, and other problems much bigger than someone moaning about an event that looked less like an attack and more like a smokescreen to enable a fugitive's escape? It's a question that many people are asking.

True appreciation of history allows people to recognize good senators as those who actually follow the law that they say they uphold, and enforce the law that they're tasked to safeguard. Critical thinking and archiving aren't just for history buffs; they're a product of good education in the criticality of the humanities and the logic of the social sciences. They're essential skills for anyone who wants to be informed and engaged.

The Commission on Higher Education proposed a new General Education curriculum that collapses history and other humanities subjects into purported interdisciplinary courses. In a joint statement, Adhika ng Pilipinas, Inc., Bagong Kasaysayan, Inc., the Philippine Historical Association, and the Philippine National Historical Society warned that this would 'privilege' narrow utilitarian outcomes over holistic intellectual and civic formation, and reduce education to skills acquisition 'without a coherent sense of purpose or responsibility.' This is a significant concern, as it could lead to a lack of depth in education.

This proposal runs contrary to the aims of higher education, which should 'cultivate informed, reflective, and responsible citizens who are capable of critical thought, ethical reasoning, and meaningful participation in society.' History, in particular, can develop the capacity 'to think critically, interpret complexity, and exercise sound judgement.' Without deep engagement with history, and without nurturing the disciplines that sustain our dreams and stories as a nation, we risk weakening our collective memory. We won't be able to learn from our past.

We lose our sense of direction. We lose the ability to see our lives as a product of context, the past, our stories, and our culture. We therefore need to educate our students meaningfully, so that their understanding of the world is cultivated and deepened. Those of us who had a large menu of GE courses often employ tools from history classes in our daily habits. We keep tabs on current events, recognize the threads of colonization and culture permeating them, and project the future based on knowledge of the past.

We read and acknowledge our limits. We archive evidence. These habits were on full display last week, when the Senate once again exploded into drama. It's clear that good education is essential in fostering critical thinking and archiving, which are crucial for good citizenship. They're not just valuable skills; they're essential for anyone who wants to be engaged and informed.

The Philippine Senate drama highlights the importance of critical thinking and archiving in good citizenship. It's not just about being a history buff; it's about being able to think critically, interpret complexity, and exercise sound judgement. As the Commission on Higher Education proposes changes to the General Education curriculum, it's essential to consider the impact on the development of critical thinking and archiving skills in students. We can't afford to neglect these skills.

'That's good citizenship—and education has to ensure that it continues, or we'll keep suffering under second-rate Senate dramas that insult our intelligence and waste our taxes.' The Philippine Historical Association, the Philippine National Historical Society, and other organizations have warned against the proposed changes, emphasizing the importance of preserving history and humanities subjects in the curriculum. They're not just advocating for these subjects; they're fighting for the future of education.

The proposed changes to the General Education curriculum have sparked concerns among historians, educators, and citizens. It's essential to consider the long-term impact of these changes on the development of critical thinking and archiving skills in students. As the Philippine Senate continues to be embroiled in drama, it's clear that good education is essential in fostering critical thinking and archiving, which are crucial for good citizenship. We can't ignore the importance of these skills.

In recent years, we've seen a decline, at least on social media, of respect for history and truth. This is threatening to be more permanent and socially acceptable. The Commission on Higher Education's proposal has sparked a debate about the importance of history and humanities subjects in the curriculum. It's essential to consider the impact of these changes on the development of critical thinking and archiving skills in students. We don't want to see a generation of students who don't value these skills.

The Philippine Senate drama highlights the importance of critical thinking and archiving in good citizenship. It's not just about being a history buff; it's about being able to think critically, interpret complexity, and exercise sound judgement. As the Commission on Higher Education proposes changes to the General Education curriculum, it's essential to consider the impact on the development of critical thinking and archiving skills in students. We can't afford to neglect these skills.

The importance of critical thinking and archiving in good citizenship can't be overstated. As the Philippine Senate continues to be embroiled in drama, it's clear that good education is essential in fostering critical thinking and archiving, which are crucial for good citizenship. The proposed changes to the General Education curriculum have sparked a debate about the importance of history and humanities subjects in the curriculum. It's a debate that we need to have.

It's essential to consider the long-term impact of these changes on the development of critical thinking and archiving skills in students. The Philippine Historical Association, the Philippine National Historical Society, and other organizations have warned against the proposed changes, emphasizing the importance of preserving history and humanities subjects in the curriculum. They're not just warning about the changes; they're advocating for the future of education.

The Philippine Senate drama is a stark reminder of the importance of critical thinking and archiving in good citizenship. It's not just about being a history buff; it's about being able to think critically, interpret complexity, and exercise sound judgement. As the Commission on Higher Education proposes changes to the General Education curriculum, it's essential to consider the impact on the development of critical thinking and archiving skills in students. We can't ignore the importance of these skills.

The Philippine Senate drama highlights the importance of critical thinking and archiving in good citizenship. The proposed changes to the General Education curriculum have sparked a debate about the importance of history and humanities subjects in the curriculum. It's essential to consider the long-term impact of these changes on the development of critical thinking and archiving skills in students. We need to think carefully about the future of education.

The Philippine Historical Association, the Philippine National Historical Society, and other organizations have warned against the proposed changes, emphasizing the importance of preserving history and humanities subjects in the curriculum. The importance of critical thinking and archiving in good citizenship can't be overstated. As the Philippine Senate continues to be embroiled in drama, it's clear that good education is essential in fostering critical thinking and archiving, which are crucial for good citizenship. We won't get good citizenship without good education.