Two advocates, Shadrack Sharu Muyesu and Nimrod Matunda Odongo, have moved to the High Court in Lodwar, seeking to have the Finance Act 2026 declared unconstitutional. The petition was filed against the Speaker of the National Assembly, the National Assembly, and the Attorney General.

This move comes after the advocates argued that the Finance Act 2026 was passed through a constitutionally defective parliamentary process marked by widespread absenteeism among MPs. According to the petitioners, the legislation was rushed through the parliamentary process without due consideration and debate.

Shadrack Sharu Muyesu and Nimrod Matunda Odongo have been vocal critics of the Finance Act 2026, arguing that it infringes on the rights of Kenyans and undermines the country's democratic institutions. The two advocates have a reputation for taking on high-profile cases, including a recent challenge to the government's handling of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Finance Act 2026 has been a subject of controversy since its introduction, with many Kenyans expressing concerns over its impact on the country's economy and the rights of citizens. The Act has been hailed by some as a step in the right direction, while others have criticized it for being too narrow in its focus and lacking in transparency.

Shadrack Sharu Muyesu and Nimrod Matunda Odongo's petition seeks to have the Finance Act 2026 declared unconstitutional and its provisions nullified. The case is expected to be a closely watched one, with many Kenyans eager to see the outcome of this high-stakes battle over the country's finances and democratic institutions.

### Key Facts

  • The petition was filed in the High Court in Lodwar
  • The respondents are the Speaker of the National Assembly, the National Assembly, and the Attorney General
  • The Finance Act 2026 was passed through a constitutionally defective parliamentary process
  • The Act has been a subject of controversy since its introduction
  • Shadrack Sharu Muyesu and Nimrod Matunda Odongo have a reputation for taking on high-profile cases

The outcome of this case will have significant implications for Kenya's economy and democratic institutions. If the Finance Act 2026 is declared unconstitutional, it could lead to a major overhaul of the country's financial policies and potentially even the government's structure.

But if the Act is upheld, it could embolden the government to push for even more sweeping changes to the country's economy and institutions, potentially at the expense of the rights and freedoms of citizens.

The case is a stark reminder of the ongoing struggle between the government and the people of Kenya over the country's finances and democratic institutions. As the battle over the Finance Act 2026 continues to rage on, Kenyans are left wondering what the future holds for their country and its economy.